twitter google-plus feed2 chevron
×

Matt Hardy responds to allegations that he betrayed TNA

Broken Matt Hardy

Some people support Matt Hardy when it comes to the whole controversy regarding the ownership of Broken Hardy gimmick but there are others who think GFW Officials are right.

One such fan who is on the side of GFW official recently commented on the whole situation from his Twitter account stating that Matt left the company for dying:

The current Raw star took notice of his tweet and replied to the accusations stating that he left because Jeff Jarrett tried to screw him out of his money:

It’s worth mentioning that the recent reports about the ownership of Broken Gimmick suggested that the two parties did reach an agreement to let Hardys use the Broken character, but it wasn’t made official.

What do you think of the whole controversy? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.


  • Nicholas2778

    News flash TNA fan it was dying long before Matt Hardy was leaving. But Matt Hardy was bringing something new to TNA but they screw him. But both Matt and Jeff Hardy was always going to finish there career in the WWE every wrestling fan new it.

  • CC

    TNA treated him like a god? Really? Because last time I looked, despite the fact that the Broken gimmick was the only thing people were talking about regarding TNA, and that that was actually bringing in new viewers (hell I have up on TNA years ago, but even I was watching that stuff online), yet they constantly tried to screw him over financially (lets not even mention the amount of late pay cheques there probably were too.

    Matt (and Jeff) owe TNA nothing. TNA/GFW owe him their very survival during the pre-Anthem buy out time.

  • D2K

    I’m more amazed that Matt took time out of his day to even respond to this character who was clearly trolling for attention.

  • Anutosh Bajpai

    well what if you landed on this article from the sidebar or through a link in twitter? if you land directly on the page, then you have absolutely no idea what is and what is not in the top headlines, so yes it’s still Worth mentioning

  • MrDr3w

    “It’s worth mentioning that the recent reports about the ownership of Broken Gimmick suggested that the two parties did reach an agreement to let Hardys use the Broken character, but it wasn’t made official.”

    Is it really still “worth mentioning” when you published an article (that can still be seen in the top headlines) just yesterday about it, Anutosh?

  • Solid

    Oh f**k off, Matt owes TNA/GFW/Anthem (yes even WWE) nothing, he’s not some salve tethered to the company for all time. The sad thing is people in TNA management probably believe this garbage also while they desperately try to cling on to the broken gimmick out of spite. (which will never be performed on TNA tv again anyways)