twitter google-plus feed2 chevron
×

Jon Bravo’s documentary implicates more talent, lacks proof for Reigns


  • oppa

    He also said that he has a ETA of when the DEA will release the second half of things to the lawyer, who will give it to him. Time will tell what will come out, if anything. The device he has ended with Richardo asking a guy if he was able to talk to The Rock or John Cena. The answer is supposedly on the other device(s).

  • Kayfabe_Is_Dead

    I wonder if one of the errors he refers to was the report that mentioned “Luther Reigns” instead of Roman Reigns. Big mistake/big difference…

  • Keith Learmonth

    He’s constantly built this whole thing around Reigns, and then has no proof he can give. Seems like a load of BS to me. People’s hate of Roman has let them cloud their judgement, and made this two-bit hack famous.

  • Greg Bush

    I’m hoping this is the last time we have to discuss this whole thing. That video was a complete waste of time.

  • Nicholas Giambattista

    Investigation is like if no arrest happens it means nothing to me.

  • Arnold Jackson

    Yeah anytime someone says they are withholding evidence because of an investigation, it means they don’t have anything. When they get called out on it, they just blame the “investigators” for either losing or refusing to release the said “evidence”. No smoke, no fire here, everyone move on.

  • oppa

    You’d think the lack of a chin would be a dead giveaway.

  • oppa

    They lied about Roman, for which he should sue, Jinder was probably not in WWE at the time, Sheamus may be screwed IF this is even true.

  • mftom

    I’m surprised James Ellsworth didn’t come out as one of the guys taking roids.