Liv Morgan posted a new rest room photo showing her abs on her Instagram story, as seen below.
WWE Hall of Famer Tamara Lynn Sytch (Tammy Sytch) known by her ring name “Sunny,” recently found herself amid a controversy. She was reportedly involved in a fatal three-car crash on U.S. 1 on Friday, March 25. According to the investigation, two witnesses said Sytch’s car was moving at a “high rate of speed” before colliding with Lasseter’s halted vehicle after Sytch failed to stop. After that, Lasseter collided with a third vehicle. After being transported to the hospital, Lasseter died.
The former WWE star and trainer Bill DeMott recently took to Twitter and called for WWE to remove Tammy Sytch from the Hall Of Fame permanently. DeMott was then attacked by the Hall of Famer recently.
Tammy Sytch’s boyfriend backs her
Now, Sytch’s boyfriend has come in defense of the former WWE star. While Sytch has yet to respond to the lawsuit, her boyfriend Pente did so recently. He denied any negligence on his part and demanded that Lasseter’s estate provide “strict proof” for that claim. He thereby denied he was responsible for Tammy Sytch’s actions, that he is liable for the incident, and, as one might expect, denied all of the allegations made against him.
According to PWInsider.com, Pente also outlined probable litigation defenses:
*That Pente is not responsible for any third-party involved in the incident (which would appear to be open to interpretation as to whether that third-party includes Tammy Sytch), nothing, “Defendant asserts that the Plaintiffs damages, if any, were proximately caused and/or contributed by the fault of third parties, named or unnamed, over whom this Defendant has no custody or control and therefore, this Defendant should be liable, if at all, only for his proportionate share of liability, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 768.81(3), Messmer v. Teachers Ins. Co., 588 So.2d 610 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) and as further supported in Fabre v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Company,623 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 1993). However, at this time, such nonparties or persons are unknown to this Defendant. Pursuant to Nash v. Wells Famo,678 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1996) this Defendant will seek amendment to identify such nonparties or persons as soon as practicable.”
*That Lasseter’s death was not caused by the incident, citing, “Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s claimed injury or damage were a result of a pre-existing medical condition and was unrelated to any act or omission of Defendant. “
*That Lasseter was not wearing a seat belt while driving, citing, “Defendant asserts the decedent failed to use an available and operational seat-belt or other safety equipment.”
*That the incident did not cause any new injuries to Lasseter, citing, “Defendant asserts that the incident alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint did not cause the Plaintiff’s new injuries and/or aggravate any pre-existing conditions. Defendant reserves the right to raise such additional affirmative defenses as may be established during discovery and by the evidence in this case.”
*That the incident was caused “by an independent and/or intervening cause.”
A judge recently decided that she was too big of a risk to the community to be a free person while she awaits trial for DUI manslaughter charges. At a bond hearing this morning, the judge ordered Tammy Lynn Sytch to return to jail while she awaits her trial. She is facing up to 30 years behind bars. Sytch had hoped to be able to stay home while she prepared to go to court.The Office of the State Attorney issued a press release this morning on the matter. RJ Larizza, who is in charge of the case, also made a statement. He said that a deadly and dangerous person has been once again removed from the streets.
The press release from the State Attorney’s office had similar undertones. It noted that they hope the move to remand Tammy Lynn Sytch to prison gives some peace to the victim’s family and friends. Sytch may remain in jail for a long time given the severity of her offenses.
