Vince McMahon’s alleged ex-girlfriend/alleged victim Janel Grant has been accused of cheating on her fiance with McMahon.
Vince McMahon Claims Accuser Janel Grant Kept Sneaking Into His Penthouse Apartment In The Middle Of The Night Despite Living With Her Fiancé In The Same Building; Vince Speaks on If He Was Pooping on Her as Part of The Affair (Court Docs) https://t.co/TosEsiPv3j pic.twitter.com/I7p2lxUw66
— Robert Littal BSO (@BSO) April 24, 2024
It was back in June 2022 that former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon found himself in a controversy due to allegations of misconduct after the revelation that he had secretly paid $3 million in hush money.
It has been noted that this scandal escalated when McMahon was recently subjected to a sex trafficking lawsuit and it led him to file a motion to compel arbitration. This legal strategy targeted to resolve the matter outside of court, typically through a more private and controlled process.
It has recently come to light that Janel Grant, the plaintiff in the sex trafficking lawsuit, has taken action to challenge McMahon’s motion to compel arbitration.
On January 25th, Janel Grant, a former WWE staff member, filed a lawsuit against WWE, John Laurinaitis, and Vince McMahon, alleging sexual assault, emotional abuse, and sex trafficking incidents dating back to March 2019.
This lawsuit saw serious allegations against these prominent figures, casting a shadow over McMahon’s reputation and raising concerns about the workplace environment within WWE.
As previously reported, Vince McMahon filed a motion to compel arbitration in the Grant v. WWE et al. case, where he denied Grant’s claims of sexual abuse and coercion, among other things, which got response from Grant’s lawyer.
As per Brandon Thurston, Janel Grant has filed a motion to strike in response to Vince McMahon’s recent filings in the Grant v. WWE et al case. In her motion, Grant’s legal team criticizes McMahon for misusing his motion to compel arbitration.
According to Grant’s filing, instead of focusing on the legal question of whether the dispute should be arbitrated, McMahon used the “Preliminary Statement” section to launch personal attacks on Grant, attempting to undermine her moral character and calling for its removal.
