Wrestling-Edge

Home » WWE News » WWE Makes More Changes to the 2012 Pay-Per-View Schedule

- WWE has made another change to their 2012 pay-per-view schedule, according to the event listing.

The Fatal 4 Way pay-per-view has replaced Bragging Rights for the month of June.

It also appears that they have dropped the TLC pay-per-view from December as Bragging Rights is now in the December slot.

  • ChadWWE

    Shouldn’t the December PPV be Armageddon since it’s 12/16, 5 days before the next end of the world?!?!?

  • steve

    why dont they go back to the old ppv’s, they were ten times better

  • Aaron

    Here is how i would have it
    January-Royal Rumble
    February-No Way Out
    March-Wrestlemania
    April-Extreme Rules
    May-KOTR(King Of The Ring)
    June-Bragging Rights
    July-The Great American Bash
    August-Summerslam
    September-Night Of Champions
    October-Armagedon
    November-Survivor Series
    December-Breaking Point

  • venom

    This is a dumb move. I like the bragging rights ppv, but having it close to Survivor series is so stupid. I was okay with it being in June.

  • blue4everd

    I thought they for rid of tge brand extention!?!? Oh and what’s heck?? Like really I hated ppvs like Hell In A Cell MITB and TLC but, all these ppvs were SO0o0o0 better than this years Summer Slam And Survivor Series!! :/ Comes to show you that ppvs are not important…it’s the storyline..:/

  • TS93

    Bragging rights wld b decent if it was set up like survivor series 2005. Team raw vs team smackdown. Melina (SD) vs Trish (RAW) and even bischoff vs teddy had some comic relief. But 90% of the paperview was SD vs RAW :)

  • Devil_Rising

    If you ask me, WWE needs to drop PPVs from their schedule. Quite frankly, they’ve gotten out of hand, and having these “gimmick” PPVs they’ve done the last few years, having one that’s “hardcore”, one that’s “TLC”, one that “MITB”, etc., is just lame. Back in the day, the “In Your House” PPVs were fine, because each one was unique, each had it’s own theme, it’s own deal, and unique name going on. But really, the only PPVs that have ever been a BIG deal, were the “Big Five”. If you ask me, why not just have like 6 or 7 PPVs a year, but make them a BIG DEAL, instead of having 12-13, but most of them suck.

  • Pissed Off Fan =(

    They should just keep the old 2002 PPVs, Royal Rumble, No Way Out, Wrestlemania, Backlash, Judgement Day, King of The Ring, SummerSlam, Unforgivene, No Mercy, Survivor Series, Vengence

  • Bill

    Why bring back Fatlal 4-Way? They only had 2 or 3 fatal 4-ways put of 7 matches. Plus, SD vs. Raw should happen at Survivor Series, so Bragging Rights is useless. Finally, why not just use older names like Vengeance, Judgement Day, Backlash, Unforgiven, Rebellion, etc? Or are those names too scary?

  • PinkSinCara

    You can’t have a “supershow” w/ Raw and SD talent every week and then host Braggings Rights. No brand unity all year round…..until December? Makes no sense!

  • DuffManLovesHimSomeWrestling

    I’d order King of the Ring, it’d be one of the only 3 I order yearly. I don’t understand why they even have bragging rights when there is Survivor Series, they are the same concept just BR is brand vs brand…

  • Stashathan

    @Zach D
    Exactly and I mean EXACTLY what I was thinkin

  • Effmenow

    We want king of the ring again. It gave mid carders a chance to shine and made for great storylines!

  • Zach D

    WTF??? As much as People say they hate TLC, Bragging Rights is sooooo much worse. What superstars hate each other them team with each other then hate each other again. Makes no sense. TLC was a great PPV this year and they scrap it. I dont like to complain but this was a dumb move.

Latest News

Newsletter

The Hottest WWE news, photos and videos delivered to your inbox in one convenient newsletter. Sign up now and give it a try!

loading